NHS Cuts - are the Tories really to blame?

The Conservative Manifesto of April 2010 was filled with hopes of a prosperous NHS and spoke with an authoritative tone toward the increase in spending provisions towards the organisation. However, today Labour accused the Coalition government of trying to conceal the telling figures (lost within a Treasury document) which illuminate that NHS spending was curbed by over £1.5 billion to just £101 bn. Whilst achieving their initial aim of combating the deficit, it must be noted that the Conservatives have turned almost 180o on their Election pledge of increasing health expenditure each year they are in power.

Despite much criticism being pinned upon Cameron and his Conservative Party, one must not forget the prominent role of the Liberal Democrats within the Government and therefore they must also hold responsibility for the Tory-led government cutting spending on the NHS in its very first year. The Liberal Democrat election campaign was focused upon the ‘broken promises’ of not only the Labour government, but those of the Conservative party in the years previous. Shadow health secretary, John Healey, accused Cameron of breaking his ‘NHS pledge’, and that apparently the reorganisation proves that you ‘can’t trust the Tories with the NHS’; however he, also, is forgetting that it is a Coalition government not solely Conservative.

Granted, the Tories NHS section to their 2010 manifesto read ‘We will back the NHS. We will increase health spending every year’. However, Osborne suggested that it is a ‘massive own goal from Labour’ as his spending plans for the financial year 2010-2011 were simply continuing the 2007 Labour spending review as he came into office one month into the financial year. The chancellor reminded the nation that NHS spending fell under the Labour government and that ‘under this government’s spending plans it is projected to rise- people can draw their own conclusions about who they trust on the NHS’.

Regardless of the NHS spending, this is another example of the Coalition government acting and the Conservative Party getting the brunt of the criticism. Nick Clegg also went against his election pledges to put an end to ‘broken promises’; the deputy Prime Minister seems to be acquiring a fairly hefty list of his own.

50p coin

This afternoon I came in from work to find my dad looking disgruntled, more so than usual. I thought that it was my floordrobe which had caused him discontent or perhaps that I had managed to break my windscreen wiper on my car for the third time this week- it turned out to be neither. It was in fact that I had not only stolen his "special" 50 pence piece from the kitchen bench but that I'd given it to my Blueline taxi driver to pay for my drunken journey home.

I initially thought that his anger was staged but he was actually outraged that in my inebriated state I had somehow managed to confuse the "special" coin for a nondescript average 50 pence piece. (Please see below for a picture of such coins).

Upon confronting him what was so special about the coin, he seemed to lack any justification in his answer, just that he wanted to keep it. I said I'd give him 50 pence to replace it but apparently it's not the same. (Except it is?) Then I thought about it, there are hundreds and thousands of these "special" coins which exchange owners everyday. Yet people feel the need to keep them, hoard them in fact, but for what reason? They're not the Princess Diana £5 that my grandma gave me when I was younger and didn't understand why my mam wouldn't let me buy a £5 mix up with. They're just coins which are worth 50p, and even if they have some pattern on them, the pattern would look awful once all the coins were collated together due to the fact that 50p pieces don't tesselate. And who wants to put loads of coins together to make a pattern anyway? Hopefully my Blueline taxi driver.